The Adelaide 36ers' Coaching Conundrum: A Missed Opportunity or Strategic Patience?
The NBL offseason is always a whirlwind of rumors, signings, and strategic moves, but this year’s Adelaide 36ers saga has me particularly intrigued. Personally, I think the decision to retain Mike Wells as head coach while reportedly leaving Trevor Gleeson waiting in the wings is a fascinating study in risk versus reward. Let’s break it down.
The Gleeson Factor: A Missed Opportunity?
One thing that immediately stands out is the 36ers’ apparent decision to pass on Trevor Gleeson, a five-time NBL champion. Gleeson, currently coaching in Japan, was reportedly eager to return to the NBL, and the prospect of reuniting with Bryce Cotton—a six-time MVP—seemed like a no-brainer. What makes this particularly fascinating is the context: the 36ers just came off a strong season, reaching the Championship Series, and Gleeson’s track record suggests he could elevate them further.
But here’s where it gets interesting: the 36ers chose continuity over change. In my opinion, this decision speaks to a broader trend in sports—the fear of disrupting a winning formula, even if it means forgoing a potentially transformative upgrade. Gleeson’s resume is undeniable, but the 36ers seem to believe that Wells, despite reported unrest, is the safer bet. What this really suggests is that the team is prioritizing stability over the unknown, which is both understandable and, frankly, a bit conservative.
Bryce Cotton’s Shadow: The Ticking Clock
What many people don’t realize is the looming presence of Bryce Cotton in this equation. At 34, Cotton is in the twilight of his career, and the 36ers are acutely aware that their championship window is narrowing. Olgun Uluc’s reporting highlights that the team conducted player surveys and exit meetings, ultimately deciding that Wells should fulfill his contract. From my perspective, this is less about Wells’ coaching prowess and more about minimizing disruption for Cotton’s sake.
If you take a step back and think about it, this is a high-stakes gamble. Cotton is the franchise cornerstone, and the 36ers are betting that Wells can maximize his remaining prime years. But this raises a deeper question: Are they sacrificing long-term potential for short-term stability? Gleeson could have brought a fresh perspective and perhaps even extended Cotton’s impact, but the 36ers seem content to play it safe.
The Broader NBL Landscape: Continuity Reigns
A detail that I find especially interesting is how the 36ers’ decision fits into the broader NBL coaching landscape. Uluc expects both Dean Vickerman (Melbourne) and Adam Forde (Cairns) to return for NBL27, signaling a league-wide trend toward continuity. This isn’t surprising—coaching changes are risky, and franchises are increasingly hesitant to rock the boat.
However, this trend also feels like a missed opportunity for innovation. The NBL has always been a league that thrives on bold moves and fresh ideas, but this offseason seems to be playing it safe. Personally, I think this conservatism could stifle growth, especially for teams like the 36ers, who are on the cusp of greatness but need that extra push.
The Roster: A Ready-Made Contender?
The 36ers’ roster is undeniably strong, with Cotton, Bul Kuol, and Zylan Cheatham leading the charge. What makes this group particularly intriguing is their blend of experience and athleticism. But here’s the catch: a ready-made roster only goes so far without the right leadership.
In my opinion, the 36ers are banking on the idea that their talent will carry them, but talent alone isn’t enough in a league as competitive as the NBL. Gleeson could have been the missing piece, the tactical mastermind to elevate this group from contenders to champions. Instead, they’re sticking with Wells, who, while competent, hasn’t yet proven he can take them over the top.
The Future: A Calculated Risk or a Missed Chance?
As we look ahead to NBL27, the 36ers’ decision to retain Wells feels like a calculated risk. They’re betting that continuity will yield results, but I can’t shake the feeling that they’ve left a golden opportunity on the table. Gleeson’s availability was a rare chance to bring in a proven winner, and passing on him could come back to haunt them.
What this really suggests is that the 36ers are more focused on the present than the future. With Cotton’s clock ticking, they’re prioritizing immediate success over long-term potential. But in a league as dynamic as the NBL, standing still often means falling behind.
Final Thoughts: A Cautionary Tale?
Personally, I think the 36ers’ decision to leave Gleeson waiting is a cautionary tale about the dangers of overvaluing stability. While continuity has its merits, it can also breed complacency. The NBL is a league that rewards boldness, and by playing it safe, the 36ers may have missed their best chance at a championship.
If you take a step back and think about it, this saga is about more than just coaching—it’s about ambition, risk, and the price of hesitation. The 36ers have a talented roster and a loyal fanbase, but their decision to stick with Wells feels like a missed opportunity to truly contend. Only time will tell if their patience pays off, but for now, I can’t help but wonder what could have been.
.jpg)
